Making robot foundation models fast enough, cheap enough, and safe enough to actually deploy.
Embodied foundation models are now good enough to matter. Most of them still miss the latency, memory, and power budgets required to run on the robot itself. This workshop is about that gap: what it actually takes to make an embodied model general, fast, and deployable on real hardware rather than in a datacenter.
This is for you if you work on compression, quantization, distillation, adaptive compute, action chunking, hardware-aware design, edge-cloud systems, or safety and control under timing constraints, whether you build vision-language-action policies, world-action models, or something that does not fit either label. Contributed papers are non-archival; submissions closed October 19 and acceptance notifications have been released.
RT-2's 55B parameters run at 1 to 3 Hz on cloud TPUs that cost more than the robot. OpenVLA reports roughly 6 Hz on an RTX 4090, and that is a desktop GPU rather than anything that rides onboard. Dexterous manipulation generally wants closed-loop rates well above what these policies deliver, and while some systems close that gap with a fast low-level servo loop under a slower policy, the policy rate still bounds how quickly the robot can change its mind. Meanwhile humanoid programs at scale (Tesla Optimus, Agility Digit, Unitree G1) make per-unit inference cost a first-order constraint: on platforms where the robot costs less than a datacenter GPU, onboard compute is a budget rather than a preference.
| Model | Params | Hardware | Reported figure | Measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action policies | ||||
| RT-2 | 55B | Cloud TPU | 1–3 Hz | closed-loop control |
| OpenVLA | 7B | RTX 4090 | ~6 Hz | throughput |
| π0 | 3.3B | – | 50 Hz | open-loop chunk rate |
| TinyVLA | 0.7–1.3B | RTX A6000 | 20× vs OpenVLA | relative latency |
| OpenVLA-OFT | 7B | A100 | 109.7 Hz (LIBERO) | throughput |
| MiniVLA | 1B | L40S | 12.5 Hz | throughput |
| HyperVLA | 90× fewer active | L4 | 482→4 ms/step | relative latency |
| BitVLA | 1.58-bit ternary | – | 11× vs OFT | relative memory |
| World models | ||||
| DreamDojo | 2–14B | RTX 5090 | 10.8 FPS | offline rollout |
| DreamZero | 14B | GB200 | 7 Hz | closed-loop control |
The last column is the point: these numbers measure different things on different hardware, so they cannot be ranked against each other. Building an evaluation that can is one of the things we want papers about.
One policy across tasks, objects, and embodiments, rather than a model per skill.
Closed-loop rates that keep up with contact-rich manipulation.
Inside a fixed onboard power, memory, and cost budget, not merely running somewhere.
Systems trade these off differently, and few manage all three at once. Speed and deployability pull apart in particular, because raw Hz can be bought with bigger hardware: OpenVLA-OFT reaches 109.7 Hz, but on an A100 that will never ride on the robot.
Smaller backbones, action chunking, quantization, pruning, distillation, and adaptive compute for policies and world models alike. Results reporting real latency, memory, energy, or control-rate gains on robot-relevant hardware are especially welcome, as is any evidence about whether these techniques compose.
Deployment trade-offs across onboard, hybrid, and cloud setups, and across heterogeneous accelerators: GPUs, TPUs, Trainium and Inferentia, mobile NPUs. Total cost of ownership at fleet scale is close to unstudied.
Interruption, fallback, and certification when inference is slow or its timing is variable. Action chunking commits a robot to open-loop execution with no principled way to interrupt it, and certifying systems with stochastic response time remains open.
v1.0.0) on NVIDIA L40S and Google Cloud TPU v6e-1. Checkpoint 1 submissions for the CoRL 2026 live workshop spotlight close November 10, 2026 (23:59 UTC).
JW
JM
DS
OAAdditional invited speakers will be announced here as invitations are confirmed.
Thursday, November 12, 2026, Afternoon Session (2:00–6:00 PM CST, 14:00–18:00) at Hilton Austin (500 E. 4th Street, Austin, TX 78701), Room 408. The four-hour program pairs four invited talks with contributed lightning talks, a poster session, a moderated panel, and a closing synthesis. Time is deliberately weighted toward the interactive parts, including live profiling on real Jetson hardware.
| Time (CST) | Session |
|---|---|
| 14:00 | Opening, framing, and live profiling Organizers frame the generality, speed, and deployability trilemma, then profile vanilla OpenVLA on a Jetson on stage, narrating memory and kernel bottlenecks |
| 14:15 | Invited talk 30 minutes including questions |
| 14:45 | Invited talk 30 minutes including questions |
| 15:15 | Lightning talks Five contributed papers, five minutes each, selected for method diversity |
| 15:40 | Afternoon break and posters All accepted papers; live demos welcome |
| 16:00 | Invited talk 30 minutes including questions |
| 16:30 | Invited talk 30 minutes including questions |
| 17:00 | Panel, topic to be announced Moderated, seating invited speakers and guests, with an audience vote before and after |
| 17:35 | Challenge results Top entries present their submissions |
| 17:45 | Synthesis: roadmap working session Organizer-facilitated, feeding the post-workshop report |
| 17:55 | Best paper and closing |
Room assignments follow the official CoRL 2026 workshop schedule and remain subject to final venue confirmation. Attendees arriving on Thursday should note that conference badge pickup is held exclusively at JW Marriott Austin (110 E. 2nd St, Room 201) from 8:00 AM to 1:30 PM CST and closes before the afternoon session begins.
We solicit four-page extended abstracts, plus unlimited pages for references, on efficiency across the whole space of embodied foundation models: VLA policies, world-action models, and emerging architectures alike.
Four pages plus unlimited references, hosted on OpenReview, reviewed double-blind. Submissions must be anonymized.
Non-archival. Accepted papers are not archived as formal publications, so submitting here does not affect your ability to submit the same work to a main conference. Concurrent submissions and work under review elsewhere are permitted. Previously published work that fits the scope is also eligible, tracked and reviewed separately from new work, so the two do not compete against each other. Every accepted paper in either track gets a poster, and lightning talks are drawn from both. Best Paper is limited to the new-work track. Papers already accepted to the CoRL 2026 main conference are not eligible.
Submission portal: OpenReview. Paper submissions closed on October 19, 2026, and acceptance notifications have been released.
We aimed for three reviews per submission. With 56 submissions and a program committee of six, each submission received one review, from the organizing committee or the invited program committee, together with a decision rationale from the chair. Paper acceptance decisions have been released on OpenReview as of November 5, 2026. All accepted papers are presented as posters, and five are additionally selected for a five-minute lightning talk.
EmbodiedX (embodied-efficiency-bench) is an open, closed-loop serving benchmark charting single-chip latency-throughput Pareto frontiers across Track 1A (π0.5-LIBERO), Track 1B (GR00T N1.7-3B), and Track 2 (Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B) in both Closed (frozen-checkpoint parity) and Open (Stage-2 task-verified compression) divisions. Season 1 standardizes on two accessible cloud accelerators, NVIDIA L40S (48 GB) and Google Cloud TPU v6e-1 (32 GB), opening unseeded on October 30 with a two-phase commit-reveal protocol that keeps participant kernels private until the freeze.
Awards and checkpoints. Early submissions merged before the November 10, 2026 (23:59 UTC) freeze are recognized live on stage at CoRL on November 12 as Founding Frontier Leaders. Season 1 closes December 18, 2026 (23:59 AoE) for official category awards across each track in Interactive Reactivity (C = 1 p99), Real-Time Fleet Throughput, and Green Embodied Efficiency (Actions/J, Predictions/J), verified on clean organizer hardware over a held-out trace split. Verified Season 1 category winners receive monetary prizes, an official CoRL 2026 EEAI Workshop Award Certificate, an invitation to apply for Google Cloud credits, and an invitation to co-author the post-season EmbodiedX Season 1 Systems Report.
Challenge page and live leaderboard → · Awards & dates · Protocol & commit-reveal · GitHub repository · Methodology specification (PDF)
Paper deadlines are 23:59 Anywhere on Earth (AoE). Following the December 18 Season 1 freeze, the public EmbodiedX leaderboard remains open continuously for rolling pull requests in 2027.
JY
OA
CL
DS
JW
ZZWe thank the following reviewers for volunteering their time on the contributed papers.